Device and method for identifying stacking and splitting of stenographic keystrokes

ABSTRACT

A method, device, and computer program product for analyzing multiple keystrokes in an electronic stenographic recording machine having keys forming stenographic keystrokes when actuated includes sensing a depressed state of at least first and second keys and recording first and second depression times, sensing released states of the first and second keys and recording first and second release times, determining an elapsed depression-release time for each of the first and second stenographic keys, determining a percentage of chronological overlap of each of the elapsed depression-release times, and separating the first and second key depressions into separate stenographic keystrokes when the percentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack of correlation between the first and second key depressions.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a:

-   -   divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/280,739, filed        Oct. 25, 2011;    -   continuation in part of U.S. Pat. No. 7,572,078, issued on Aug.        11, 2009 (which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of        U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/552,569, filed Mar. 12,        2004); and    -   a continuation in part of U.S. Pat. No. 8,096,714, issued Jan.        17, 2012 (which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C.        §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/855,547, filed        Oct. 31, 2006, filed Mar. 12, 2004),        the complete disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by        reference herein in their entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The invention lies in the field of keystroke devices. In particular, theinvention is in the field of computer or stenographic keyboards andmethods and software for interpreting keystrokes of these keyboards.

Various keystroke devices exist in the art. The most prevalent keystrokedevice is a computer keyboard. The keys of a standard computer keyboardare merely switches electronically indicating only a depressed state.Therefore, no signal is output or indicated by the keyboard when akeyboard is at rest, and a signal corresponding to depressed key(s) isoutput or indicated only when at least one key is depressed sufficientlyfar to “set off” the switch of that key or the switches of that set ofkeys.

A typewriter also has a keyboard, which can be mechanical and/orelectronic. Like the computer keyboard, actuation (e.g., depression) ofa key is intended to print a character. In electronic typewriters, whena key is actuated sufficiently far, a signal is sent to a processor tohave the corresponding key(s) printed on the typing medium (e.g.,paper). Mechanical typewriters are similar to electronic typewriters,but with one significant difference. Mechanical typewriters connect thekey of the keyboard directly to the hammer containing the correspondingcharacter to be printed on the page. Such a connection typically placesthe key at the end of a lever connected to a fulcrum and, when the leveris depressed at a proximal end, the distal end of the lever forciblycontacts or causes a hammer to pivot its distal end towards the page. Aprinting ribbon is disposed between the page and the end of travel ofthe hammer and a character formed at the end of the hammer is printed onthe paper because the raised character presses the printing ribbonagainst the page. Because such an assembly is a mechanical connectiondependent upon the pressure imparted by the user, the hammer can hit thepage with varying degrees of force. A relatively hard contact produces aclearly printed character on the page. In contrast, a relatively softcontact may produce a lightly printed character, which also can bereferred to as a “shadow.” For mechanical typewriters, it is moredesirable to have clearly printed characters than to have shadowcharacters. Therefore, improvements were made over the history ofmechanical typewriters to guarantee relatively uniform contact betweenthe hammer and the page, which improvements were, thereafter,incorporated into most electronic typewriters.

Another keystroke device can be found on stenographic devices. The mostmodern stenographic devices are entirely electronic and virtuallyimmediately translate the stenographic key actuations into an accuratewritten representation of the spoken word. These modern devices areanalogous to the electronic typewriters and computer keyboards in that aspecific actuation of a key or set of keys will cause a clear printingor storage of the corresponding character or set of characters.Insufficient depression of a key(s) will not generate any output.Alternatively, depression of a set of keys (which is common forstenographic dictation) where one or more keys is sufficiently actuatedbut one or more other key(s) is insufficiently actuated will generate anoutput that does not correspond to the stenographers' intended output.Thus, the stenographer or computer associated with the stenographicdevice might not be able to accurately translate the inadequatelyactuated key(s) depending upon what was actually output to the paper orthe electronically stored file.

The earlier stenographic devices provided an advantage over the modernstenographic devices. The older devices gave a stenographer some abilityto determine a correct output from an incorrect input because theseolder mechanical devices printed the output on the paper in varyingdegrees of lightness. Stenographers refer to a lightly printed output as“shadow” output. So, if an intended output was lightly printed on thestenographic paper, that stenographer might have been able to determinewhat was intended during the original dictation and correctly translatethe spoken word in the final transcript. Modern stenographic devices,however, are not able to electronically understand or store shadowoutput. If the stenographer does not actuate a key adequately, then nooutput is generated. And, if keys of a set of keys are actuated invarying degrees, then incorrect output is transcribed.

Problems stenographers have faced for many years are referred to as“stacking” and “splitting.” Either “stacking” or “splitting” resultswhen a reporter presses several keys simultaneously and not all keysmake contact with the sensing mechanism at the same time or are releasedat the same time. Stacking refers to a situation where multiple keys arepressed at the same or substantially the same time and are erroneouslyrecorded as a single keystroke. Splitting refers to a situation whereone keystroke is recorded as two keystrokes.

Since traditional keyboards can only record “on” and “off” values, theprior art has relied on simple timing algorithms to try to minimizestacking problems. More advanced versions of stenographic softwareprovide “anti-stacking” algorithms. However, presently-known algorithmscan cause the opposite problem to occur, i.e., splitting.

Therefore a need exists to overcome the problems with the prior art asdiscussed above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a device, method, and computer program productfor identifying stacking and splitting of stenographic keystrokes thatovercomes the hereinafore-mentioned disadvantages of theheretofore-known devices and methods of this general type and thatcorrectly groups or separates stenographic keystrokes having some amountof depression overlap.

With the foregoing and other objects in view, there is provided, inaccordance with the invention, a method for analyzing multiplekeystrokes in an electronic stenographic recording machine having keysforming stenographic keystrokes when actuated, which comprises sensing adepressed state of a first stenographic key and recording a firstdepression time, sensing a depressed state of a second stenographic keyand recording a second depression time, sensing a released state of thefirst stenographic key and recording a first release time, sensing areleased state of the second stenographic key and recording a secondrelease time, determining an elapsed depression-release time for each ofthe first and second stenographic keys, determining a percentage ofchronological overlap of each of the elapsed depression-release times,and separating the first and second key depressions into separatestenographic keystrokes when the percentage of chronological overlapindicates a lack of correlation between the first and second keydepressions.

In accordance with another mode of the invention, there is provided thestep of defining the first and second key depressions as a singlestenographic keystroke when the percentage of chronological overlapindicates correlation.

In accordance with a further mode of the invention, there is providedthe steps of sensing a depressed state of a third stenographic key andrecording a third depression time, sensing a released state of the thirdstenographic key and recording a third release time, sorting the first,second, and third depression times based on a chronological order ofoccurrence, determining, within the sorted depression times, a pair ofchronologically adjacent depression times with a greatest chronologicalvariation therebetween, determining an elapsed depression-release timefor each one of the determined pair of adjacent depression times, andcarrying out the separating step by separating the first, second, andthird key depressions into one of three separate stenographic keystrokeswhen the percentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack ofcorrelation for all of the first, second, and third key depressions andtwo separate stenographic keystrokes when the percentage ofchronological overlap indicates correlation among two of the first,second, and third key depressions and a lack of correlation by one ofthe first, second, and third key depressions.

In accordance with an added mode of the invention, the first, second,and third key depressions are defined as a single stenographic keystrokewhen the percentage of chronological overlap indicates correlation amongall of the first, second, and third key depressions.

In accordance with an additional mode of the invention, the separatingstep is carried out to create the two separate stenographic keystrokesby forming a first of the two separate stenographic keystrokes from thekeys having the depressed state chronologically preceding and includingthe key with the earlier one of the pair of chronologically adjacentdepression times and forming a second of the two separate stenographickeystrokes from the keys having the depressed state chronologicallyfollowing and including the key with the later one of the pair ofchronologically adjacent depression times.

In accordance with yet another mode of the invention, the depressedstate is entered when a depressed one of the keys travels downward pasta respective registration point.

In accordance with yet a further mode of the invention, the releasedstate is entered when a released one of the keys travels upward past therespective registration point.

In accordance with yet an added mode of the invention, the depressed andreleased states are determined at least in part by an optical sensor.

With the objects of the invention in view, there is also provided amethod for analyzing multiple keystrokes in an electronic stenographicrecording machine having keys forming stenographic keystrokes whenactuated, the method comprising recording a plurality of downward timemarkers, each of the downward time markers indicating a time when adifferent one of at least three stenographic keys moves downward past arespective stenographic key registration point, recording a plurality ofupward time markers, each of the upward time markers indicating a timewhen a different one of the at least three stenographic keys movesupward past its respective key registration point to register arespective key stroke, chronologically sorting the downward timemarkers, determining, within the plurality of sorted downward timemarkers, a pair of chronologically adjacent downward time markers with agreatest chronological difference therebetween, determining an elapsedtime for each one of the determined pair of adjacent downward timemarkers, the elapsed time being defined to start when a respective oneof the stenographic keys moves downward past its registration point andto end when the respective one stenographic key moves upward past itsregistration point, determining a percentage of chronological overlap ofthe determined elapsed times, and separating the at least three keystrokes into at least two separate stenographic keystrokes when thepercentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack of correlationamong the at least three key strokes.

In accordance with yet an additional mode of the invention, the at leastthree key strokes is defined as a single stenographic keystroke when thepercentage of chronological overlap indicates correlation among all ofthe at least three key strokes.

In accordance with again another mode of the invention, the stenographickey registration point is between a fully released state and a fullydepressed state of a key.

In accordance with again a further mode of the invention, there isprovided the step of sensing one of the at least three stenographic keysmoving past its registration point with an optical sensor.

In accordance with again an added mode of the invention, the separatingstep is carried out by forming a first of the two separate stenographickeystrokes from the keys having the downward time marker chronologicallypreceding and including the key with the earlier one of the pair ofchronologically adjacent downward time markers and forming a second ofthe two separate stenographic keystrokes from the keys having thedownward time marker chronologically following and including the keywith the later one of the pair of chronologically adjacent downward timemarkers.

With the objects of the invention in view, there is also provided acomputer program product for analyzing multiple keystrokes in anelectronic stenographic recording machine having keys formingstenographic keystrokes when actuated, the computer program productcomprising a non-transitory storage medium readable by a processingcircuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuitfor performing a method comprising recording a plurality of downwardtime markers, each of the downward time markers indicating a time when adifferent one of at least three stenographic keys moves downward past arespective stenographic key registration point, recording a plurality ofupward time markers, each of the upward time markers indicating a timewhen a different one of the at least three stenographic keys movesupward past its respective key registration point to register arespective key stroke, chronologically sorting the downward timemarkers, determining, within the plurality of sorted downward timemarkers, a pair of chronologically adjacent downward time markers with agreatest chronological difference therebetween, determining an elapsedtime for each one of the determined pair of adjacent downward timemarkers, the elapsed time being defined to start when a respective oneof the stenographic keys moves downward past its registration point andto end when the respective one stenographic key moves upward past itsregistration point, determining a percentage of chronological overlap ofthe determined elapsed times, and separating the at least three keystrokes into at least two separate stenographic keystrokes when thepercentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack of correlationamong the at least three key strokes.

In accordance with again an additional mode of the invention, the methodfurther comprises defining the at least three key strokes as a singlestenographic keystroke when the percentage of chronological overlapindicates a correlation among all of the at least three key strokes.

In accordance with still another mode of the invention, eachregistration point is between a fully released state and a fullydepressed state of a key.

In accordance with still a further mode of the invention, the methodfurther comprises carrying out the separating step by forming a first ofthe two separate stenographic keystrokes from the keys having thedownward time marker chronologically preceding and including the keywith the earlier one of the pair of chronologically adjacent downwardtime markers and forming a second of the two separate stenographickeystrokes from the keys having the downward time marker chronologicallyfollowing and including the key with the later one of the pair ofchronologically adjacent downward time markers.

With the objects of the invention in view, there is also provided anelectronic stenographic recording machine comprising a set ofstenographic keys operable to form stenographic keystrokes whenactuated, a memory, a processor, and a sensor communicatively coupled toat least one of the memory and the processor. The sensor is operable tosense a depressed state of a first stenographic key in the set ofstenographic keys and cause the processor to store a first depressiontime in the memory, sense a depressed state of a second stenographic keyin the set of stenographic keys and cause the processor to store asecond depression time in the memory, sense a released state of thefirst stenographic key and cause the processor to store a first releasetime in the memory, and sense a released state of the secondstenographic key and cause the processor to store a second release timein the memory. The processor is operable to determine an elapseddepression-release time for each of the first and second stenographickeys, determine a percentage of chronological overlap of the elapseddepression-release times, and separate the first and second keydepressions into two separate stenographic keystrokes when thepercentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack of correlationbetween the first and second key depressions.

In accordance with still an added mode of the invention, the processoris further operable to define the first and second key depressions as asingle stenographic keystroke when the percentage of chronologicaloverlap indicates correlation between the first and second keydepressions.

In accordance with a concomitant mode of the invention, the sensor isoperable to sense a depressed state of a third stenographic key in theset of stenographic keys and cause the processor to store a thirddepression time in the memory, and sense a released state of the thirdstenographic key and cause the processor to store a third release timein the memory, and the processor is further operable to sort the first,second, and third depression times based on a temporal order ofoccurrence, determine, within the plurality of sorted depression times,a pair of chronologically adjacent depression times with a greatestchronological variation therebetween, determine an elapseddepression-release time for each one of the determined pair of adjacentdepression times, and to carry out the separating step by separating thefirst, second, and third key depressions into at least two separatestenographic keystrokes when the percentage of chronological overlapindicates a lack of correlation among the first, second, and third keydepressions.

Other features that are considered as characteristic for the inventionare set forth in the appended claims.

Although the invention is illustrated and described herein as embodiedin a device and method for identifying stacking and splitting ofstenographic keystrokes, it is, nevertheless, not intended to be limitedto the details shown because various modifications and structuralchanges may be made therein without departing from the spirit of theinvention and within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims.

The construction and method of operation of the invention, however,together with additional objects and advantages thereof, will be bestunderstood from the following description of specific embodiments whenread in connection with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a fragmentary, side elevational view of one embodiment of akeystroke device according to the invention;

FIG. 2 is a wire-frame perspective view of a machine having akey-retaining device for receiving a plurality of the keystroke deviceof FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a wire-frame side elevational view of the machine, thekey-retaining device, and the keystroke device of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a wire-frame perspective view of the machine and the keystrokedevice of FIG. 2 without the key-retaining device;

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the machine and the keystroke device ofFIG. 2 without the key-retaining device;

FIG. 6 is a fragmentary side elevational view of a first embodiment of adistal end of a distal portion of the keystroke device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a fragmentary side elevational view of a second embodiment ofthe distal end of the distal portion of the keystroke device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 8 is a fragmentary side elevational view of a third embodiment ofthe distal end of the distal portion of the keystroke device of FIG. 1;

FIG. 9 is a block circuit diagram of a stenographic system according tothe invention;

FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating a first embodiment of the methodfor assigning shadows according to the invention;

FIG. 11 is a flow chart illustrating a second embodiment of the methodfor assigning shadows according to the invention;

FIG. 12 is a process flow chart illustrating a first process of anembodiment of a method for sensing and correcting stacking andsplitting; and

FIG. 13 is a process flow chart illustrating a second process of anembodiment of a method for sensing and correcting stacking andsplitting.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosedherein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodimentsare merely exemplary of the invention, which can be embodied in variousforms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosedherein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis forthe claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in theart to variously employ the present invention in virtually anyappropriately detailed structure. Further, the terms and phrases usedherein are not intended to be limiting; but rather, to provide anunderstandable description of the invention. While the specificationconcludes with claims defining the features of the invention that areregarded as novel, it is believed that the invention will be betterunderstood from a consideration of the following description inconjunction with the drawing figures, in which like reference numeralsare carried forward.

The terms “a” or “an”, as used herein, are defined as one or more thanone. The term “plurality,” as used herein, is defined as two or morethan two. The term “another,” as used herein, is defined as at least asecond or more. The terms “including” and/or “having,” as used herein,are defined as comprising (i.e., open language). The term “coupled,” asused herein, is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly,and not necessarily mechanically. The terms “program,” “softwareapplication,” and the like as used herein, are defined as a sequence ofinstructions designed for execution on a computer system. A “program,”“computer program,” or “software application” may include a subroutine,a function, a procedure, an object method, an object implementation, anexecutable application, an applet, a servlet, a source code, an objectcode, a shared library/dynamic load library and/or other sequence ofinstructions designed for execution on a computer system. A “storagemedium,” as used herein, is defined as any medium that is readable by acomputer or computer controlled device and capable of storing a computerinstruction or computer-readable data.

Referring now to the figures of the drawings in detail and first,particularly to FIG. 1 thereof, there is shown a single keystroke device10 to be used in a keyboard of some kind. The keystroke device 10 has acontact area 12 at which a user imparts the force for activating thekeystroke device 1. The contact area 12 is connected to a proximalportion 16 of a key lever 14. The key lever 14 is connected movably to akey-retaining device 40 (see FIG. 2) at a pivot point 20. The key lever14 defines a pivot area 15 disposed between a distal portion 18 of thekey lever 14 and the proximal portion 16 of the key lever 14. The keylever 14 has a bias extension 19 (also referred to as a cam lever) forreceiving a force that will be imparted upon the key lever 14 to keepthe contact area 12 raised, i.e., in a non-actuated position.

In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 to 5, the bias extension 19 has, at adistal end thereof, a hook 22 to be inserted through an end ring of abias device 24, e.g., a spring, illustrated only diagrammatically inFIG. 1. To impart a raising force to the key lever 14, the spring isoriented so that the force imparted on the bias extension 19 rotates theproximal portion 16 counter-clockwise with respect to FIGS. 1 to 5 aboutthe pivot point 20. The bias extension 19 and hook 22 shown in FIGS. 1to 5 is only an exemplary embodiment for keeping the keystroke device 1in a non-actuated position. The configuration of the bias extension 19can take any form and the direction of force imparted by biasing springcan be in any direction so long as the contact area 12 is raised whennot activated and biases the key to the raised position after beingactuated. (The described configuration, of course, assumes that thekeystroke device 10 is to be actuated by a lowering movement. Force inthe opposite direction applies if the keystroke device 10 is to belifted by a user.)

To communicate an actuation of the contact area 12 by a user toelectronics of machine 1 in which the keystroke device 10 resides, themachine 1 has a switch or contact 50. The contact 50 can take any formso long as a given actuation of the contact area 12 imparts a sufficientforce to the contact 50 to indicate that a user wants the correspondingfunction of the keystroke device 10 to be activated (e.g., to print acharacter on a page and/or to store a character in an electronic file).The contact 50 can be merely a conducting contact surface that completesan electrical circuit when the keystroke device 1 is fully actuated orit can be a piston or lever that is depressed to actuate a switchphysically when the keystroke device 1 is fully actuated. Therefore, itis not necessary to illustrate the contact 50 other thandiagrammatically.

To sense a depression depth of the contact area 12, a sensor 30 isdisposed somewhere at the lever 14 such that the sensor 30 can detecthow far the contact area 12 has been depressed. The sensor 30 can bedisposed anywhere with regard to any portion (16, 18, 19) of the leverso long as it can detect movement of the lever 14. In a preferredembodiment, however, the sensor 30 is disposed adjacent the distalportion 18 and on a side of the pivot point 20 opposite the proximalportion 16. In this preferred embodiment, to keep movement of thesegment of the distal portion 18 with respect to the sensor 30 linear,the measuring surface of the distal portion 18 (top surface in FIG. 1)has a longitudinal extent that passes directly through the center of thepivot point 20. It is noted that if the sensor 30 can detect all of thedesired number of movement “levels” from non-depression of the lever 14to full depression of the lever 14, then the contact 50 is renderedunnecessary.

For purposes of illustration, the sensor 30 in FIG. 1 has a circularcutout 32. Therefore, in the view of FIG. 1, the distal portion 18 canbe seen through the cutout “window.” The position of the lever 14 inFIG. 1 is shown blocking approximately half of the window. Accordingly,if a light were placed on one side of the distal portion 18 and alight-detector was placed on the other side of the distal portion 18,then the amount of light received by the detector would be approximatelyhalf of the amount received when the distal portion 18 was not blockingany part of the window.

The sensor 30 can detect movement of the distal portion 18 in any numberof ways. In the preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the distal portion18 blocks a non-illustrated light source of the sensor to vary an amountof light, the variance being proportional to a displacement of thecontact area 12 by a user. Blocking of the light source is dependentupon the shape of distal portion 18. FIGS. 6, 7, and 8 illustrate threeexemplary embodiments for the distal end (furthest from the pivot point20) of the distal portion 18. When the distal portion 18 is curved asdiagrammatically illustrated in FIG. 6, the light source is blocked in alinear manner. In comparison, when the distal portion 18 is linear, asshown in FIG. 7, the light source is blocked in an exponential manner.Finally, when the distal portion 18 is curved as shown in FIG. 8, thelight source is blocked in a non-linear manner.

The embodiment in FIG. 1 has a distal portion 18 with the shapecorresponding to FIG. 6. Thus, the light detected by the sensor 30 willbe directly proportional to the travel of the proximal portion 16. Fromthe detected light, the sensor 30 (or the detector of the sensor 30) canoutput a signal (e.g., a voltage level) dependent upon the movement ofthe distal portion 18. Such a signal can be processed to allow themachine 1 to not only register a keystroke, but also to register apartial-keystroke, i.e., a shadow. If an evenly and equally separatenumber of shadow levels are desired, then a linear output is preferred.

It is noted that the sensor 30 need not be placed at the distal portion18 as illustrated in FIGS. 1 to 5. Instead, the sensor 30 can bepositioned at the proximal portion 16. For example, if the sensor 30 isdisposed above the proximal portion 16 as viewed in FIG. 1, then a restposition of the lever 14 places the proximal portion 16 to completelycover the window 32 of the sensor 30, and depression of the lever 14moves the proximal portion 16 away from the window 32 to uncover thelight source and allow light to be detected in an increasing manner thefurther the lever 14 is depressed.

In an embodiment of the sensor 30 where an analog voltage is output, adepth of the keystroke is registered by a change in the value of theanalog voltage, which voltage is controlled by the distal portion 18,attached to or integral with the key arm, selectively interrupting theoptical receiver. When such an analog signal is provided, the sensor 30can be connected to a downstream analog-to-digital converter for laterdigital interpretation of the level of the light received.

Other possible options for detecting a position of the lever 14 exist.For example, the depth of a keystroke can be registered with a digitaldecoder directly connected to the lever 14. Such a decoder outputs adirect digital value dependent upon depth of the keystroke. Because thedecoder is digital, the internal algorithm can, through appropriatesoftware, make the output digital value change in any desiredmanner—linearly, exponentially, or otherwise—dependent upon the recordeddepth of the keystroke.

Also, processing can include an algorithm that allows the user toselectively change/adjust the range and/or the number of levels of theoutput signal. An input device can be provided to give the stenographera user-customized interpretation of a full key actuation, a partial keyactuation, and/or any number of levels between no actuation and fullactuation. The customizing input can be provided through appropriatemanipulation of a physical item (a dial) or by executing a softwareprogram that controls the processing of the electrical input signalcorresponding to the key actuation depth.

Alternatively, instead of generating more than two levels of a keystrokeas set forth above, the sensor 30 can merely output two levels. In afirst embodiment, the sensor 30 can output two levels corresponding to apartial key actuation (a shadow) and a full key actuation. In thisconfiguration, a switch 50 is unnecessary. In a second embodiment, thesensor 30 can be, for example, a three-part system with two switches 50:a first of the switches registering a partial key actuation; and asecond of the switches registering a complete key actuation, or, theswitch 50 can be a single two-level switch.

The sensor can also have the capability of using an optical encodingwheel to measure the key throw. For example, an encoder can be used toproduce a pulse when the wheel (operatively connected to the lever 14)moves a given distance. Also, a focused light beam can be used to countrotations of the encoder wheel.

Varying degrees of movement of the lever 14 can also be detected using aresistive device, e.g., a resistor network or a potentiometer, with thedepth of the keystroke being dependent upon a resistance presented bythe device to a resistance measuring circuit. An accelerometer can alsobe used to detect the depth of the keystroke.

The above embodiments relate to the mechanics of the keystroke device 10according to the invention. Once the sensor 30 generates the electricaloutput signal, this signal can be supplied to a processor P forevaluation.

Emulation of the appearance of a printed stenographic output with apaperless electronic stenotype machine having an electronic display(e.g., LED, LCD, Flat Panel) can occur by electrically supplying depthinformation for each key pressed by the user in addition to theelectronic data corresponding to the particular stenographic stroke,also sometimes referred to herein as a “word”. When a stroke isregistered but is within a specified range less than a full depth of thestroke, the stroke can be stored electronically as a shadow. If, forexample, ten values of shadow can be detected (or are programmed to bedetectable), those values can be assigned to a specific level ofbrightness (e.g., in a look-up table or programmed in an EEPROM orstored in a flash RAM, hard drive, or static RAM) or, instead of a lookup table, an equation can be used to shift the depth value byte fourbits to get an intensity scale. Thus, the shadow will display on theoutput screen as characters lighter than a non-shadowed character.Instead of using merely brightness of the character(s) as the visibleindicator, the shadow can also be varied using a difference in color,font, or other display attribute, or even by a combination of differentdisplay attributes.

FIG. 9 is a block circuit diagram of a stenographic device according tothe invention. The stenographic machine 1 has a plurality of keystrokedevices 10, which are connected to an on-board microprocessor 2. Amemory 3 (e.g., RAM, ROM, hard drive, removable memory) is connected tothe microprocessor 2 for storing data and supplying stored data to themicroprocessor 2. A display 4 is connected to the microprocessor 2 fordisplaying stenographic and/or translated data and for displaying theshadows determined/detected by the microprocessor 2. The microprocessor2 controls all electronic operations including receiving stenographicdata and shadow data, storing all data, and displaying all desiredprocesses, which processes can include the stenographic and/or leveldata itself, indications that data is being stored, indications thatdata is being translated, translated stenographic output, and manyothers.

Depending upon the configuration of the stenographic device, atranslator 5 can be on-board the device and, therefore, it is directlyconnected to the microprocessor 2 for translating stored or incoming(real-time) stenographic data. Thus, input electronics for the keystrokedevice can be directly connected to the same processor 2 that controlsthe translation program, and the functions of input, shadowdetermination, translation, and correction/editing can be performed on asingle unit 1.

If the translator is not on board the stenographer's device 1, then thedevice 1 can be connected to an external stenographic translator 6, inwhich case the translator 6 is separate from the stenographic device 1and information stored in the memory 3 is relayed 7 either by transferthrough an intermediate media (e.g., floppy disk, micro-drive), in whichcase the device will have a floppy drive, USB port, IEEE 1394 port,etc., or wirelessly through some kind of communication data link (e.g.,a Bluetooth, ISDN, Internet, or other wired or wireless data link), inwhich case the device will have an on-board transceiver 8.

In either case, the translator 5, 6 translates the stenographic data tothe respective language (e.g., English). When the device 1 is associateddirectly with a translation system, translation occurs quickly so thatthe stenographer can view his/her stenographic keystrokes in almostreal-time and in relatively understandable English (dependent upon thequality of the word/translation processor). The memory 3 will store thetranslation locally 3, 11 and/or externally 7, 9.

FIG. 9 further illustrates the stenographic device 1 and an embodiment 9for connecting the device to an external stenographic translator 6. Inthe example of FIG. 9, the translator 6 is connected to the Internet andis housed at a location different from the stenographer's location. Insuch a networked configuration, the transceiver 8 can utilize abi-directional data channel to transmit the un-translated stenographicdata to the external translating computer 6 (represented by the dashedarrows), whether in real time or delayed. The translating computer 6can, then, translate the stenographic data and transmit a translateddata stream back to the device immediately or at a later time and to anyother device that can be connected (directly or wirelessly) to thetranslating computer (also represented by the dashed arrows). Thus, thestenographer can have almost real-time analysis even without having anon-board translator.

One example of such a system 9 provides the stenographic device 1 with aconnection (e.g., a direct or wireless transceiver 8) to the Internetand the external translating computer 6 with a connection (direct orwireless) also to the Internet. Thus, commonly available Internetconnection devices available at the location where the stenographer istaking data can be used to facilitate quick and inexpensive translationof stenographic data without having to store the translation software onthe stenographer's machine 1.

When the device 1 has an integrated word processing system, then thefunctions of dictation, translation, and editing of the translation canbe performed by the stenographer on a single machine.

The device 1 can also include a multi-media recorder 11 that can store,in a memory 3, digital video images and/or audio data. By recording theaudio and/or video of the subject(s) of the stenographer on the device,it becomes possible to associate a portion of the multi-media file witha stenographic stroke. Such recording and coordination of stenographicand video and/or audio data allows the stenographer to playback imagesof and/or sounds from the subject to assist in the accurate translationof the stenographic keystrokes. Such multi-media data can also betransmitted to other computers and/or locations through networkconnections, for example, over the Internet, by wireless connections,such as Bluetooth, by direct connections, such as RS-232, universalserial bus, IRDA, Firewire, or by any other available datacommunications measures to assist the stenographer in accuratetranslation of the stenographic data.

If a stroke registered by the device is not in the user's stenographicdictionary, an internal algorithm of the translator 5, 6 can beactivated to add and/or remove shadowed keys from the stroke until astenographic match is found for the particular key(s) activation,somewhat like a closest-match routine known in the art of spell-checkingdevices. Thus, where a partial key actuation (shadow) occurs and thekeystroke is not translatable, the shadowed keystroke can be combinedwith other similar stenographic keystrokes and, along with a spellingand grammar checking device, and can be corrected to fix a mis-stroke orcan provide the stenographer with a list of various possibletranslations for that mis-stroke, which list would be examined by thestenographer at a later time, i.e., when the stenographic dictationbreaks or at another location entirely.

A first exemplary method for interpreting a depth of the keystroke isillustrated with respect to the flowchart of FIG. 10. In Step 100, aquery is performed to determine if a stroke has been detected. If astroke has been detected, then, in Step 200, the level of the stroke isdetermined, in other words, whether or not the stroke is a shadowstroke. If the level is determined to be full (complete actuation of thekeystroke), then, the corresponding stenographic stroke with or withouta full-level indicator is/are stored/transcribed in Step 300. If thelevel of the stroke is determined to be partial, then two possibilitiesoccur. If the system is only configured to register a full stroke or apartial-stroke, then, in Step 400, the just-received stenographic strokeis indicated as being a partial-level (shadow), and the correspondingstenographic keystroke and a shadow indicator are stored/transcribed inStep 500. If, however, the system is configured to detect more than justone partial-level, the corresponding actuation level is detected and theappropriate shadow is determined along with the detection of thejust-received stenographic stroke in Step 400. In such a case, thecorresponding stenographic stroke and shadow level arestored/transcribed in Step 500.

A query is made in Step 600 to determine if stroke entry is finished(which, for example, may be indicated by a separate input from thestenographer or by depressed keys passing the registration point uponrelease). If the answer is no (e.g., the default situation), then, thedevice 1 waits in Step 700 for the receipt of a new stroke (meeting apredefined minimum keystroke depth requirement).

Registering of a keystroke is detected in Step 100 by a changetransmitted by a keystroke device sensor, e.g., in an analog voltage orby a digital position indicator. In a digital system, the depth of thekeystroke is translated into a digital numeric value. The value can havemore than three variations or can be a tertiary value, including on,off, and shadow. Subsequently, the value is translated into a visualindicator for the corresponding shadow or full value, the indicatorincluding color, shade, font style, position, and/or size of the symbolthat represents the actuated key or set of keys (these examples beingonly representative of possible visual display characteristics). If thestenographer is finished entering keystrokes (i.e., end of the job),then the keystrokes are translated in Step 800. It is noted thattranslation can be in real-time and, therefore, the circuit of Steps 100to 700 can be repeated continuously and occur in parallel withtranslation. In such a configuration, Step 600 would be omitted and thedashed arrows in FIG. 10 would be performed instead.

A second exemplary method for interpreting depth of the keystroke isillustrated with respect to the flowchart of FIG. 11. In Step 1100, thestenographic dictation begins. In Step 1102, audio and/or video of theproceedings to be stenographed are recorded electronically, whichrecording is an option to be selected by the stenographer. In Step 1104,a query is performed to determine if any key has been pressed past itsregistration point. If not, the system waits until this event occurs. InStep 1106, a query is performed to determine if all keys that are pastthe registration point create a recognizable stenographic stroke.

If the answer is yes, then, in Step 1108 a, the time of the recognizablestroke is recorded and stored with the stenographic data in a massstorage device and/or internal memory and the audio and/or video datafile is also stored along with information regarding the location in thedata file of the stored stenographic data. Accordingly, the user can goback to the stenographic stroke and correct any errors in transcriptionby examining the relevant video and/or audio. It is optional, in Step1110 a, to pass the stored stenographic stroke to an internal translatorand/or to produce a text display.

If the answer is no and a recognizable stenographic stroke is notcreated, then an attempt to produce a recognizable stroke is performedbased upon all of the keys that passed the registration point incombination with any partial key presses that did not reach registrationpoint but were pressed in some way. Specifically, in Step 1108 b, thetime of the unrecognizable stroke is recorded and stored with thestenographic data in a mass storage device and/or internal memory andthe audio and/or video data file is also stored along with informationregarding the location in the data file of the stored stenographic data.Accordingly, the user can go back to the stenographic stroke and correctany errors in transcription by examining the relevant video and/oraudio. In Step 1110 b, the unrecognizable stroke is passed to aninternal translator to find a likely match or a set of possible matches.A text display can be made and/or a suitable signal (beep) can occur tonotify the user that a potential error in transcription has occurred.The user can view the stroke, which will include any partial key pressesidentified by a different color, intensity of color, font, and/or size.If possible (because transcription is still occurring), the user canselect the appropriate translation from the suggestions in real time.

In Step 1112, the stenographic data is transmitted to an externaltranslator through some communications link, e.g., RS-232, USB, Network,Bluetooth, Firewire, WIFI, or any other data transmission measures.Optionally, in Step 1114, an external translator can check thetranslation data and relay that data through an available output device,such as an RS-232 port or network connection to an external displaydevice such as a computer. This process is repeated until dictation iscomplete.

It is noted that the optional recording of audio and/or video dataallows CIC and permits the user to track the stenographic data with thecorresponding audio/video data and, thereby, correct any incorrectstenographic translation.

Other possible uses for the keystroke device 10 according to theinvention include musical instruments. In one example, the volume of thenote would increase or decrease based upon a level of the output signal.In another example, the volume of the note would increase dependent upona rate of change of the signal (velocity).

In addition to the above-described features, the present inventionprovides a method and device for identifying and correcting stenographicproblems referred to as “stacking” and “splitting.” As set forth herein,“stacking” refers to a situation where multiple keys pressed at the sameor substantially the same time are erroneously recorded as a singlekeystroke. Splitting, on the other hand, refers to a situation where onekeystroke is recorded as two keystrokes.

The present invention is able to recognize a stacking or splittingcondition and interpret the intended keystroke. In general, theinvention recognizes two or more keys moving downward at the same timeand assumes that they are part of the same keystroke, even if some ofthose keys started their downward travel at a different time. Likewise,if some of the keys are released before all the keys traveling downwardat the same time have reached the bottom of the stroke, the inventionassumes that they are part of the same keystroke.

The details of the presently inventive method of avoiding stacking andsplitting is explained in conjunction with diagrams 1-8 and the processflow charts of FIGS. 12 and 13. In the following diagrams, the character“D” represents a key going down past the registration point and thecharacter “U” represents the same key moving back up past theregistration point. The “registration point” is a position between afully un-depressed or released state and a fully depressed state of akey. The registration point can be detected by physical sensors, opticalsensors, or others. The optical sensor can detect a registration pointwhen light is detected, absence of light is detected, of some value inbetween. In one embodiment, a membrane with an optical gradient isintroduced between a light source and a photo detector and when thelight level reaches a predefined level, the registration point itrecognized. When the key is pressed sufficiently far enough to registeras a key press, the registration point has been passed by the key. Inthe diagrams, each “-” character is a sensor reading. A longer line of“-” characters represents a longer period of time. Further, each of thefollowing diagrams is an example of two keys being sensed, however, asdiscussed and shown below, the invention is not limited to only twokeys:

Diagram 1:

1---D===U-------------

2-------------D====U—

Diagram 1 illustrates the second key (indicated with numeral “2”) beingdepressed after the first key has passed the registration point (in adownward direction) and, then, has returned past the registration pointagain (in an upward direction). In this situation, both the prior artand in the present invention register these two strokes as separatekeystrokes.

Diagram 2:

1----D=========U-----

2-------D====U-------

Diagram 2 illustrates a second-depressed key both traveling downwardpast the registration point and returning upward through theregistration point before a first-depressed key has returned upwardsthrough the registration point. In this situation, both the prior artand in the present invention register these two strokes as a singlekeystroke.

Diagram 3:

1-----D=======U------

2-------D=======U----

Diagram 3 shows a situation where the first key is depressed and, veryshortly thereafter, a second key is depressed. Then, the first key isreleased shortly before the second key is released. This situation fallsin between the examples shown in Diagrams 1 an 2 and, although it islikely that one stroke was intended, in the prior art, stacking orsplitting occurs because it is not clear what was intended by thereporter.

Diagram 4:

1----D=======U-------

2----------D=======U-

Diagram 4 shows a situation where the first key is depressed and, sometime thereafter, a second key is depressed. Here, as compared to Diagram3, the time between depression of the first stroke and the second strokeis longer. Then, the first key is released substantially before thesecond key is released. This situation also falls in between thesituations shown in Diagrams 1 and 2 and, although there is a greatertime separation between the keystrokes and it is likely that one strokewas intended, in the prior art, stacking or splitting occurs because itstill is not completely clear what was intended by the reporter.

The difference between Diagrams 3 and 4 is only in the amount ofoverlap. The presently inventive method of correctly interpretingkeystrokes monitors the amount of time that transpires between thedownstroke registration and the registration of the upstroke of the samekey. A stack is determined if the overlap of two keystrokes, which caninclude multiple keys, is below a certain percentage of an overlap oftwo identified key depression times. In one embodiment, this percentagevalue is user-definable.

It is easy to recognize that the stacking and splitting problems shownin Diagrams 1-4 quickly grows more complex when more than two keys areinvolved. However, the present invention provides a device and efficientmethod for determining whether a stacked or split keystroke has beenrecorded. This method is illustrated in the process flowcharts of FIGS.12 and 13.

Referring first to FIG. 12, in Step 1200, stenographic dictation beginsand, in Step 1202, a user captures the dictation using a stenographicmachine. In Step 1204, a query is performed to determine if a stroke hasbeen detected. The present invention improves stenographic functionalityby continuously monitoring the downward and upward keystrokes. Whilecontinuously detecting for a stroke, both downward and upward, thesensor records, in Step 1206, the time at which each key travelsdownward past the registration point. Next, in Step 1208, the sensorrecords the time in which each key travels upward past the registrationpoint. When the last key travels upward past the registration point, theflow proceeds back up to Step 1204 and waits for the next stroke tooccur.

Diagrams 5 and 6 show two example collections of multiple keys beingdepressed that could be collected and graphed using the informationobtained in Steps 1206 and 1208 of FIG. 12.

Diagram 5:

----D=========U-----

1-D=======U---------

2-------D=======U---

-----D=====U--------

-------D=======U----

---D======U---------

Diagram 6:

-D=========U--------

1-D=======U---------

2-------D=======U---

---D=====U----------

--D======U----------

---------D======U---

In both Diagrams 5 and 6, two of the sensor readings, 1 and 2, arelabeled to illustrate the operation of the present invention. Sensorreadings 1 and 2 are the same in both samples. To the eye, one can tellthat the sample strokes of Diagram 6 “look” like two keystrokes, whileDiagram 5 looks like one stroke that is a bit erratically spread outover time. The spreading out of Diagram 5 can happen if the user ishitting a particularly difficult stroke and has to “work” with his/herhands to position all of the fingers in the right place.

FIG. 13 illustrates a separate process that begins after Step 1208 ofFIG. 12. To positively determine what keystrokes were intended inDiagrams 5 and 6, the present invention sorts the readings from earliestto latest, according to when the keys moved past the registration point.Of course, the sorting can also be from latest to earliest or any othersorting methods that properly arrange the keystrokes.

The flow of FIG. 13 begins at Step 1300 where the data is received fromStep 1208. In Step 1302, the data is analyzed and transformed by sortingthe downward strokes, in this case, from earliest to latest in time.Diagrams 7 and 8 show the sorted data of Diagrams 5 and 6, respectively.

Diagram 7:

1--D=======U---------

2---D======U---------

3----D=========U-----

4-----D=====U--------

5-------D=======U----

6--------D=======U---

Diagram 8:

1-D=========U--------

2--D=======U---------

3--D======U----------

4---D=====U----------

5--------D=======U---

6---------D======U---

After performing the sort in Step 1302, the two adjacent readings withthe largest difference between starting points is determined in Step1304. In both exemplary Diagram 7 and exemplary Diagram 8, readings 4and 5 have the largest difference.

After the readings have been determined in Step 1304, the overlappercentage of the two keys is calculated in Step 1306. In other words, aquery is performed to determine how much of the first key's depressedtime was shared with the second key's depressed time. In Step 1308, thedetermined percentage of overlap is compared to a predetermined overlapthreshold value. The predetermined overlap threshold can be userdefinable through an interface or, alternatively, hard coded in thequery. If the overlap percentage is below the threshold, indicating alack of correlation, all of the readings above the second adjacent key(keys 1 through 4 in this example) are used in Step 1310 to form theintended first keystroke and all of the readings below the firstadjacent key (keys 5 and 6) are used to form a second keystroke. In theexample diagrams above, Diagram 7 produces one stroke and Diagram 8produces two strokes. The process then moves back up to Step 1302.

Alternatively, if the overlap percentage determined in Step 1308 isabove the threshold, indicating correlation of the keys, all of the keysare used in Step 1312 to form a stroke. The process then moves back upto Step 1302. Of course, the present invention can be performed on acombination of only two key strokes. Such a determination of keystrokes, in the case of only two keys, would not require steps 1302 and1304 because there are only two key depression times to analyze.

A device, method, and computer program product has been disclosedautomatically detects and corrects stenographic keystrokes thatpreviously resulted in stacking or splitting. The present inventionadvantageously reduces mistakes and improves accuracy and efficiency ofstenographic reporters.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for analyzing multiple keystrokes in anelectronic stenographic recording machine having keys formingstenographic keystrokes when actuated, which comprises: sensing adepressed state of a first stenographic key and recording a firstdepression time; sensing a depressed state of a second stenographic keyand recording a second depression time; sensing a released state of thefirst stenographic key and recording a first release time; sensing areleased state of the second stenographic key and recording a secondrelease time; determining an elapsed depression-release time for each ofthe first and second stenographic keys; determining a percentage ofchronological overlap of each of the elapsed depression-release times;and separating the first and second key depressions into separatestenographic keystrokes when the percentage of chronological overlapindicates a lack of correlation between the first and second keydepressions.
 2. The method according to claim 1, which further comprisesdefining the first and second key depressions as a single stenographickeystroke when the percentage of chronological overlap indicatescorrelation.
 3. The method according to claim 1, which furthercomprises: sensing a depressed state of a third stenographic key andrecording a third depression time; sensing a released state of the thirdstenographic key and recording a third release time; sorting the first,second, and third depression times based on a chronological order ofoccurrence; determining, within the sorted depression times, a pair ofchronologically adjacent depression times with a greatest chronologicalvariation therebetween; determining an elapsed depression-release timefor each one of the determined pair of adjacent depression times; andcarrying out the separating step by separating the first, second, andthird key depressions into one of: three separate stenographickeystrokes when the percentage of chronological overlap indicates a lackof correlation for all of the first, second, and third key depressions;and two separate stenographic keystrokes when the percentage ofchronological overlap indicates correlation among two of the first,second, and third key depressions and a lack of correlation by one ofthe first, second, and third key depressions.
 4. The method according toclaim 3, which further comprises defining the first, second, and thirdkey depressions as a single stenographic keystroke when the percentageof chronological overlap indicates correlation among all of the first,second, and third key depressions.
 5. The method according to claim 3,which further comprises carrying out the separating step to create thetwo separate stenographic keystrokes by: forming a first of the twoseparate stenographic keystrokes from the keys having the depressedstate chronologically preceding and including the key with the earlierone of the pair of chronologically adjacent depression times; andforming a second of the two separate stenographic keystrokes from thekeys having the depressed state chronologically following and includingthe key with the later one of the pair of chronologically adjacentdepression times.
 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein thedepressed state is entered when a depressed one of the keys travelsdownward past a respective registration point.
 7. The method accordingto claim 6, wherein the released state is entered when a released one ofthe keys travels upward past the respective registration point.
 8. Themethod according to claim 1, wherein the depressed and released statesare determined at least in part by an optical sensor.
 9. A method foranalyzing multiple keystrokes in an electronic stenographic recordingmachine having keys forming stenographic keystrokes when actuated, themethod comprising: recording a plurality of downward time markers, eachof the downward time markers indicating a time when a different one ofat least three stenographic keys moves downward past a respectivestenographic key registration point; recording a plurality of upwardtime markers, each of the upward time markers indicating a time when adifferent one of the at least three stenographic keys moves upward pastits respective key registration point to register a respective keystroke; chronologically sorting the downward time markers; determining,within the plurality of sorted downward time markers, a pair ofchronologically adjacent downward time markers with a greatestchronological difference therebetween; determining an elapsed time foreach one of the determined pair of adjacent downward time markers, theelapsed time being defined to start when a respective one of thestenographic keys moves downward past its registration point and to endwhen the respective one stenographic key moves upward past itsregistration point; determining a percentage of chronological overlap ofthe determined elapsed times; and separating the at least three keystrokes into at least two separate stenographic keystrokes when thepercentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack of correlationamong the at least three key strokes.
 10. The method according to claim9, which further comprises defining the at least three key strokes as asingle stenographic keystroke when the percentage of chronologicaloverlap indicates correlation among all of the at least three keystrokes.
 11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the stenographickey registration point is between a fully released state and a fullydepressed state of a key.
 12. The method according to claim 9, whichfurther comprises sensing one of the at least three stenographic keysmoving past its registration point with an optical sensor.
 13. Themethod according to claim 9, which further comprises carrying out theseparating step by: forming a first of the two separate stenographickeystrokes from the keys having the downward time marker chronologicallypreceding and including the key with the earlier one of the pair ofchronologically adjacent downward time markers; and forming a second ofthe two separate stenographic keystrokes from the keys having thedownward time marker chronologically following and including the keywith the later one of the pair of chronologically adjacent downward timemarkers.
 14. A computer program product for analyzing multiplekeystrokes in an electronic stenographic recording machine having keysforming stenographic keystrokes when actuated, the computer programproduct comprising: a non-transitory storage medium readable by aprocessing circuit and storing instructions for execution by theprocessing circuit for performing a method comprising: recording aplurality of downward time markers, each of the downward time markersindicating a time when a different one of at least three stenographickeys moves downward past a respective stenographic key registrationpoint; recording a plurality of upward time markers, each of the upwardtime markers indicating a time when a different one of the at leastthree stenographic keys moves upward past its respective keyregistration point to register a respective key stroke; chronologicallysorting the downward time markers; determining, within the plurality ofsorted downward time markers, a pair of chronologically adjacentdownward time markers with a greatest chronological differencetherebetween; determining an elapsed time for each one of the determinedpair of adjacent downward time markers, the elapsed time being definedto start when a respective one of the stenographic keys moves downwardpast its registration point and to end when the respective onestenographic key moves upward past its registration point; determining apercentage of chronological overlap of the determined elapsed times; andseparating the at least three key strokes into at least two separatestenographic keystrokes when the percentage of chronological overlapindicates a lack of correlation among the at least three key strokes.15. The computer program product according to claim 14, wherein themethod further comprises defining the at least three key strokes as asingle stenographic keystroke when the percentage of chronologicaloverlap indicates a correlation among all of the at least three keystrokes.
 16. The computer program product according to claim 14, whereineach registration point is between a fully released state and a fullydepressed state of a key.
 17. The computer program product according toclaim 14, wherein the method further comprises carrying out theseparating step by: forming a first of the two separate stenographickeystrokes from the keys having the downward time marker chronologicallypreceding and including the key with the earlier one of the pair ofchronologically adjacent downward time markers; and forming a second ofthe two separate stenographic keystrokes from the keys having thedownward time marker chronologically following and including the keywith the later one of the pair of chronologically adjacent downward timemarkers.
 18. An electronic stenographic recording machine comprising: aset of stenographic keys operable to form stenographic keystrokes whenactuated; a memory; a processor; a sensor communicatively coupled to atleast one of the memory and the processor and operable to: sense adepressed state of a first stenographic key in the set of stenographickeys and cause the processor to store a first depression time in thememory; sense a depressed state of a second stenographic key in the setof stenographic keys and cause the processor to store a seconddepression time in the memory; sense a released state of the firststenographic key and cause the processor to store a first release timein the memory; and sense a released state of the second stenographic keyand cause the processor to store a second release time in the memory;and the processor being operable to: determine an elapseddepression-release time for each of the first and second stenographickeys; determine a percentage of chronological overlap of the elapseddepression-release times; and separate the first and second keydepressions into two separate stenographic keystrokes when thepercentage of chronological overlap indicates a lack of correlationbetween the first and second key depressions.
 19. The electronicstenographic recording machine according to claim 18, wherein theprocessor is further operable to define the first and second keydepressions as a single stenographic keystroke when the percentage ofchronological overlap indicates correlation between the first and secondkey depressions.
 20. The electronic stenographic recording machine ofclaim 18, wherein: the sensor is operable to: sense a depressed state ofa third stenographic key in the set of stenographic keys and cause theprocessor to store a third depression time in the memory; sense areleased state of the third stenographic key and cause the processor tostore a third release time in the memory; the processor is furtheroperable to: sort the first, second, and third depression times based ona temporal order of occurrence; determine, within the plurality ofsorted depression times, a pair of chronologically adjacent depressiontimes with a greatest chronological variation therebetween; determine anelapsed depression-release time for each one of the determined pair ofadjacent depression times; and to carry out the separating step byseparating the first, second, and third key depressions into at leasttwo separate stenographic keystrokes when the percentage ofchronological overlap indicates a lack of correlation among the first,second, and third key depressions.